 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue CatKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / September 2005Digger News [OT]
Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he looks healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, unscathed by his adventure. She said she saw empty, torn-open bags of dog food laying around the neighborhood, so it looks like the people who rescued Gypsy also left food for the animals they couldn't capture (God bless the hearts of those kind souls!!!). She also said there was nothing in the house that is salvageable (we already knew that, but seeing it had to be hard for her), but getting Digger back went a long ways in raising their spirits as they poked through the moldy wreckage. She'll be picking Gypsy up on her way back to Houston so, aside from my son-in-law who has to stay in New Orleans for his job, their family will be reunited again - YAY! Thank you so much for all the purrs you sent for my daughter to find her dogs - purr power is an amazing thing!!!!!! Hugs, CatNipped > Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he looks > healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, unscathed by [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > CatNipped Purrs for a happy reunion for Digger and Gypsy. > Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he looks > healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, unscathed by his [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > CatNipped So the real question is this: Will your idiot daughter and her husband make a contingency plan NOW so the next time they have to evacuate, they don't leave their dogs behind to drown? AND are they planning to wite a BIG FAT check to the Humane Societies who cared for Gypsy when she was rescued? Or are they going to continue to let other people take care of their responsibilities? They are damn lucky to have those dogs back and I hope to God they don't take them for granted, ever again. Do not throw that puppy in the back yard with vicious adult dogs simply because he is a Rotty. Being a Rotty has nothing to do with whether or not he will be able to "hold his own" with them. He will undoubtedly be forced into submission by the strange dogs, which will be extremely stressful to him, and may change his temperament. Digger deserves better after being abandoned and left to drown - f.ck your husband and his focus on materialism. I'm beginning to think your entire family is comprised of idiots. -L. > > Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he looks > > healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, unscathed by his [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > So the real question is this: Will your idiot daughter and her husband > make a contingency plan NOW SLAP You just have to look for trouble, don't you? And then you are so surprised when it finds you. Well, it is about to find you again. > SLAP > > You just have to look for trouble, don't you? And then you are > so surprised when it finds you. > > Well, it is about to find you again. Oh shut up Nancy Carter Moore. You and your desperate "threats" are pathetic. -L. > > SLAP > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Oh shut up Nancy Carter Moore. You and your desperate "threats" are > pathetic. Who? And no, that's not threat, just an observation. You should have learned your lesson about stalking, but you just cannot leave well enough alone. The reluctant stay at home Mommy, eh? It's Lyn Wegrich Glover, right? You make an interesting Google. How many user names have you had? And how many users? lol >> > SLAP >> > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > It's Lyn Wegrich Glover, right? You make an interesting Google. How > many user names have you had? And how many users? lol > >> > SLAP > >> > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > It's Lyn Wegrich Glover, right? You make an interesting Google. How > > many user names have you had? And how many users? lol Piss off, moron. So you're bored. Find something else to do. None of the parties involved is a stupid as you think. Wild Bill and Zach are not puppets for you to manipulate. We're trying to discuss cats here. That is something upon which all parties actually agree. What are you trying to do? (Aside from fan the flames, just because you are so f.cking lame that you have nothing better to do. I know for sure that no cat would suffer your presence.) On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 04:37:51 -0400, wrote: >> >> > SLAP >> >> > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >None of the parties involved is a stupid as you think. Wild >Bill and Zach are not puppets for you to manipulate. But we are here to save usenet from stalkers and kooks such as yourself. >We're trying to discuss cats here. That is something upon which >all parties actually agree. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >lame that you have nothing better to do. I know for sure that >no cat would suffer your presence.) Lyn Wegrich Glover Interesting - GIT-R-DONE! alt.usenet.legends.lamey On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:45:12 +0200 (CEST), wrote: >>> > SLAP >>> > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >> It's Lyn Wegrich Glover, right? You make an interesting Google. How >> many user names have you had? And how many users? lol Looks like it's time to visit the cat froups again Bringing in the troops this time. - GIT-R-DONE! alt.usenet.legends.lamey > > > SLAP > > > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Who? Oh, is this another of your multiple personalities speaking? LOL.... And no, that's not threat, just an observation. You should have learned > your lesson about stalking, but you > just cannot leave well enough alone. Yeah, yeah, yeah....we all know who the stalker is, Nanny-poo. Give it a rest. No one is that interested in you - you're a boor. -L. >> Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he >> looks healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > husband > make a contingency plan NOW so the next time they have to evacuate, Would you give this a rest? She had no control over what her daughter or anyone else did. > Do not throw that puppy in the back yard with vicious adult dogs > simply because he is a Rotty. Being a Rotty has nothing to do with > whether or > not he will be able to "hold his own" with them. She doesn't WANT to do that. Good lord. RIF - Reading is FUNdimental. > I'm beginning to think your entire family is comprised of idiots. > > -L. Why are you still trying to stir up this sh.t? Just ignore CN's posts if you don't like what she posts. Jill > >> Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he > >> looks healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Would you give this a rest? She had no control over what her daughter or > anyone else did. As her Mother, I suppose her opinion (and blessing) has nothing to do with her daughter's behavior. And I suppose you and the rest of the Sepford Community here think it;'s perfectly acceptable to abandon dogs to drown in an emergency. Then you have the gall to pretend to be animal lovers. Shame on all of you. > > Do not throw that puppy in the back yard with vicious adult dogs > > simply because he is a Rotty. Being a Rotty has nothing to do with > > whether or > > not he will be able to "hold his own" with them. > > She doesn't WANT to do that. Good lord. RIF - Reading is FUNdimental. She said the Rotty puppy could "hold his own" simply because he's a Rotty. Go back and read the thread. She was only concerned about Gypsy. > > I'm beginning to think your entire family is comprised of idiots. > > > > -L. > > Why are you still trying to stir up this sh.t? Not stirring up sh.t. Just asking if the a.sholes learned their lesson. Will they make provisions for their dogs in the future now that they were lucky enough to get them back? Will they compensate the organizations that went out of their way to rescue the dogs they dumped like pieces of trash? Why do I get the distinct feeling that the answer to both of those questions is a NO.... >Just ignore CN's posts if > you don't like what she posts. Sorry Sweetums. I will express my opinion just like eveyone else on this newsgroup. Just because the masses of pithed zombies here think it's ok to abandon dogs when it's inconvenient to do otherwise doesn't mean everyone does. Maybe no one wants to hold them accountable for their cruelty, but I won't stand by and pretend it's ok. Purr on that. -L. >>>> Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he >>>> looks healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > As her Mother, I suppose her opinion (and blessing) has nothing to do > with her daughter's behavior. Well let's see. My mother doesn't "bless" the fact that I'm dating a man I met first in 1979 and had a 2-year relationship with, which resumed nearly 24 years later. Could she influence me? Perhaps. Would I let her? Not necessarily. I'm a middle-aged woman, not a teenager. And I suppose you and the rest of the > Sepford Community here think it;'s perfectly acceptable to abandon > dogs > to drown in an emergency. Then you have the gall to pretend to be > animal lovers. Shame on all of you. This isn't a Stepford community; to say that simply because we support each other as friends is ridiculous. We did not think it was acceptable but it was beyond CN's control by the time she heard from her daughter so what was she supposed to do? >>> Do not throw that puppy in the back yard with vicious adult dogs >>> simply because he is a Rotty. Being a Rotty has nothing to do with [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Rotty. Go back and read the thread. She was only concerned about > Gypsy. She said MAYBE the Rotty could "hold his own", better than the elderly Gypsy. She was still arguing the point with her husband. >> Why are you still trying to stir up this sh.t? > > Not stirring up sh.t. Just asking if the a.sholes learned their > lesson. Will they make provisions for their dogs in the future now > that they were lucky enough to get them back? They probably will, but IIRC they didn't realize how fast Katrina was going to come in. I can't comment on that because I, who live inland, watched the storm and would have made arrangements and/or have left sooner, but still, it's not CN's fault. No point in blaming her. Will they compensate > the organizations that went out of their way to rescue the dogs they > dumped like pieces of trash? They lost everything - how can they compensate the rescue organization when they have to wade through paperwork and find out if they will even get compensation for their belongings from insurance claims? FEMA be damned, the brunt of this will be borne by homeowners insurance claims. >> Just ignore CN's posts if >> you don't like what she posts. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > -L. Oh get over it. I speak my mind on a regular basis. I'm not a zombie nor a drone and neither am I an uncaring person. You're merely stirring the flames, which is not necessary and you know it. Jill >>>> Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he >>>> looks healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, [quoted text clipped - 53 lines] > > -L. You know, I dont' at all agree with the fact that they left the dogs. However, I also think that to continue to be agressive about this is useless. They probably HAVE learned that it was stupid. Along with about 5000 or so other people. They have learned that NOT all hurricanes are easily ridden out and returned to. They are exceptionally fortunate those dogs survived and beyond that that they found them. I know of people that actually gave their pets to the SPCA with ID on the carriers and animals and they can't find them now. I'm wandering from my point now, and that is that it is not condoning something to be happy that the dogs are OK. >You know, I dont' at all agree with the fact that they left the dogs. >However, I also think that to continue to be agressive about this is [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >wandering from my point now, and that is that it is not condoning >something to be happy that the dogs are OK. Continuing the discussion about whether ir was right or wrong for CN's daughter to leave the dogs is like beating a dead horse. It's over and done with, the dogs have both been found and are alright. So let's get back to rational discussions. Come on, people, get over it and quit quoting Lyn and Topaz vertabatim. We all know that they are trying to cause trouble and break up rpca. Are we going to let them? NO!!!!!!!!!!! Purrs and Hugs, Nan and the felinity felines A wise man talks because he has something to say; a fool talks because he has to say something. Come on, people, get over it > and quit quoting Lyn and Topaz vertabatim. We all know that they are > trying to cause trouble and break up rpca. Are we going to let them? > NO!!!!!!!!!!! Indeed, I wish people would not feed the trolls - & quoting them means those who have kill-filed them are still subjected to them! Cheers, helen s > Come on, people, get over it > > and quit quoting Lyn and Topaz vertabatim. We all know that they are [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Cheers, helen s Of course, anyone who voices a concern that doesn't meet the group-think parameters is a troll. Then you have the gall to think you aren't a drone. -L. > Continuing the discussion about whether ir was right or wrong for CN's > daughter to leave the dogs is like beating a dead horse. No one brought that up. I merely asked if they were going to make restitution, and even more importnatly, to make sure it never happens again. Fair enough questions, seeing how they blew it last time... > It's over > and done with, the dogs have both been found and are alright. So > let's get back to rational discussions. Come on, people, get over it > and quit quoting Lyn and Topaz vertabatim. We all know that they are > trying to cause trouble and break up rpca. Don't flatter yourself. I don't give a sh.t about your little coffee clatch. I am merely asking if the a.sholes learned their lesson. Apparently not...no evidence otherwise, and not a brain cell between the lot of them. Good thing there are good people who work for shelters to clean up the messes idiots like this make... -L. > You know, I dont' at all agree with the fact that they left the dogs. > However, I also think that to continue to be agressive about this is > useless. They probably HAVE learned that it was stupid. Really? You think so? Do they have an evacuation plan in place now for their animals? I haven't seen any mention of it... > Along with > about 5000 or so other people. They have learned that NOT all [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > wandering from my point now, and that is that it is not condoning > something to be happy that the dogs are OK. Fair enough. Are you also concerned that they will do this again, the next time they have to evacuate? Or are you like the rest of the drones here, and don't care? Do you think they should compensate the organizations that cared for and returned their dogs? Or do you think that burden should fall on the shoulders of an already taxed animal rescue system? Can anyone here handle discussing the *real* questions of this saga? Or do you all like to pretend life is just full of sparkly play things, purrs, and hugs? -L. >> You know, I dont' at all agree with the fact that they left the dogs. >> However, I also think that to continue to be agressive about this is [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > next time they have to evacuate? Or are you like the rest of the > drones here, and don't care? I'm concerned about a lot of things that I have no control over. Brow beating has never been, to my knowledge, an effective tool of change. > Do you think they should compensate the organizations that cared for > and returned their dogs? Or do you think that burden should fall on > the shoulders of an already taxed animal rescue system? I would certainly make an offering when I was able. I cannot control others though. > Can anyone here handle discussing the *real* questions of this saga? > Or do you all like to pretend life is just full of sparkly play things, > purrs, and hugs? > > -L. I think you seem to want to grind an ax rather than discuss an issue. If you wanted to discuss an issue, you would actually start a discussion and not just follow this particular case. As I've said before, I keep carriers out at all times in case of needing to leave quickly. What do you do? > > Fair enough. Are you also concerned that they will do this again, the > > next time they have to evacuate? Or are you like the rest of the > > drones here, and don't care? > > I'm concerned about a lot of things that I have no control over. Brow > beating has never been, to my knowledge, an effective tool of change. Just asking questions, Karen. If CN feels brow-beat that's her own guilt talking. > > Do you think they should compensate the organizations that cared for > > and returned their dogs? Or do you think that burden should fall on > > the shoulders of an already taxed animal rescue system? > > I would certainly make an offering when I was able. I cannot control > others though. That's not the question. Do you think they should make compensation? Or do you not care? Personally, I think every person who abandoned an animal should be fined. Boarding fees run about $30/day/animal in most shelters. Anyone who was lucky enough to get their dog back should compensate the shelter for their dog's care. That's the least they could do. > > Can anyone here handle discussing the *real* questions of this saga? > > Or do you all like to pretend life is just full of sparkly play things, [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > If you wanted to discuss an issue, you would actually start a > discussion and not just follow this particular case. This is the only case that's been posted. I am going to voice my dissent, whether or not you like it. I am just wondering what the a.sholes are going to do now that they got their dogs back, to ensure this isn't going to happen again. It's a fair enough question, especially in light of the fact that CN has been asking for support for these people, here in this ng. So what I am hearing is that asking for purrs/prayers when somebody totally f.cks up is ok, but asking that it not happen again isn't....? Is that the group-think mentality here? And my question regard compensation certainly is fair since I have worked for Humane Societies in the past. How do you think those organizations stay running? The least they can do is compensate the orgs for the food and shelter. > As I've said > before, I keep carriers out at all times in case of needing to leave > quickly. What do you do? Quake is the only real danger here, other than fire. I have contingency plans for all my animals - including alternate housing, carriers, first-aid kit, meds, and food and water supplies. I have my animals housed in the sturdiest part of our home in case of earthquake. I have an axe in the pet area so that if I have to chop my way out of there due to fire or quake, I can. And you can bet if a fire was raging within striking distance of my home I wouldn't sit around and wait until the last minute to see whether or not it was going to hit me... -L. >>> Fair enough. Are you also concerned that they will do this again, >>> the next time they have to evacuate? Or are you like the rest of [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Boarding fees run about $30/day/animal in most shelters. You must board your pets in the wrong places, then. I board Persia for $12 a night - note the NIGHT; this isn't a hotel where check-out is at 11 AM. I don't get charged by the day so if I pick her up the day after my flight gets in, no extra charge. $12 is the flat rate regardless of the type of pet - dog, cat, etc. and they provide the kennel and the food, litter, walkies, and they even do a free weigh and checkup to make sure nothing is wrong. I did have one vet that charged $15 a night. But never $30. That's just ridiculous. Jill > >>> Fair enough. Are you also concerned that they will do this again, > >>> the next time they have to evacuate? Or are you like the rest of [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > wrong. I did have one vet that charged $15 a night. But never $30. That's > just ridiculous. We are not talking about a vet or a boarding facility. We are talking about a shelter where the cost, is, indeed, $30/day or more to care for an animal that is housed there. They have added overhead that other facilities don't have - and they care for far more animals in one day than most facilities see in a week or a month, for that matter... My experiences with boarding facilities are that you get what you pay for. Vets are usually less expensive, but the cat is basically in the cage the whole time with little contact other than feeding, watering and cleaning. A much better choice is a private dedicated boarding facility where the animals get individualized play time (usually in a dedcated space) and attention. The staff at vet hospitals are simply too busy to give your animals much attention, although their love of the animals is most genuine. Of course, the best option of all is a sitter who comes to your home to care for the animal. -L. >>>> Fair enough. Are you also concerned that they will do this again, >>>> the next time they have to evacuate? Or are you like the rest of [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Jill Our vet will baord pets (only if they are patients there - that way they have easy access to their records and know ahead of times if there are health or behaviour issues that you may forget to mention to any other kennel), and they charge $7/critter/day (a day being a 24 hour period). >You must board your pets in the wrong places, then. I board Persia for $12 >a night - note the NIGHT; this isn't a hotel where check-out is at 11 AM. When I had to board Hobo for about 2 weeks, I checked out our regular vet's arrangements. Since he is diabetic, I wanted a "hospital" atmosphere where he'd be watched closely. After seeing what our vet had to offer, for $15.00 a day, I said (to myself) no way in hell was *my* cat going there for that long. It was horrific. I was getting his special diet food at another, closer animal hospital and checked out their facilities - what a difference!! For *$10.00* a day, he got a large condo cage, upper "floor" for resting, lower floow for litter and food & water. In addition, there was a "TLC room" where there were toys, climbing trees, a large picture window to peer out, etc., and twice a day, the boarding cats were taken there for an hour for stretching their legs and playing. Guess which vet hospital we chose? Incidentally, Hobo now has a new vet. Jeanne > >You must board your pets in the wrong places, then. I board Persia for $12 > >a night - note the NIGHT; this isn't a hotel where check-out is at 11 AM. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Jeanne I used to board Persia at her vet and Peaches at the avian vet. The avian vet wanted to charge me $17 a night for Peaches. Huh? I mentioned this at Persia's vet; yes, they board birds. They don't treat them but they have access to her avian vet 24/7 (they recommended this guy to me when I got Peaches). And it's such a hoot for them to have Peaches since they aren't used to parrots. When I picked them up after my last trip they didn't want to let her go! They love the way she sings and plays with her bell toys. She's a very cheerful little bird :) And they just *love* Persia. She's got the split-level condo thing like you describe and when there are no other cats around (she doesn't get along with other cats) she has the run of the room. I made sure to inspect the area before I ever boarded her there. When people walk by the room she calls out to them to come in and pay her homage, which of course they do! Jill ...don't care? > Do you think they should compensate the organizations that cared for > and returned their dogs? Or do you think that burden should fall on > the shoulders of an already taxed animal rescue system? ...> -L. I think they need time to get their affairs sorted out. But, yes, I agree that people who used the services of rescue organizations should compensate those organizations. Also, everyone should make plans to evacuate their pets along with the rest of the family in times of emergency. Rescue organizations, especially the small local organizations, generally run on next to nothing. Volunteers risked their own health to find and rescue animals left behind. I'm sure in many, if not most cases, this was done at their own expense. I don't believe that I am in a position to assume or know which people will and which people won't do the right thing. Unfortunately, in stressful times, we don't always think straight, but we can learn from our mistakes and the mistakes of others. Fortunately, they did something right. They put a microchip and I.D. tag on the older dog. We know that the younger dog did not have a microchip, but that it is their intent to get him one. I'm under the impression that he had some I.D. on him that would have helped someone identify him if the neighbor had not found him. I don't think Lori's relatives owe me an explanation for their actions or future plans. I don't agree with leaving the dogs behind and I hope they learned from it. But, I think that kicking somebody when they're down reveals more about the person doing the kicking than it does about the person who receives the beating. It certainly does not lead to a discussion of issues, which is what you said you are trying to do. Just my opinion. Annie > I think they need time to get their affairs sorted out. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > rescue animals left behind. I'm sure in many, if not most cases, this was > done at their own expense. *I'M* going to make a donation to the rescue organization that found and boarded Gypsy. But it would be really hard for my daughter to do so since they lost their home (with no insurance on it since it was paid for and not in their name) and everything they own. In fact, with three small children to take care of, I would question her judgment if she even tried to send anything other than a thank you card (which she has, along with a long letter of appreciation). Here are some pictures of what they found when they went back to their house on Monday and Tuesday of this week: http://www.possibleplaces.com/StBernard/Erin/ Some of the pictures are blurry because she was crying and the camera shook as she was taking the pictures. That's Greg's sister, Gina (my daughter's sister-in-law), in the blue shorts. Erin is in only one picture inside the house in silhouette. Hugs, CatNipped > *I'M* going to make a donation to the rescue organization that found and > boarded Gypsy. But it would be really hard for my daughter to do so since > they lost their home (with no insurance on it since it was paid for and not > in their name) and everything they own. They can sell their ATV. It's in pretty good shape. As is their truck. And their kid's donated instruments. And anything else of value thay have. But instead they'll rely on charity, of course. Because they don't take any responsibility for themselves. Just like you. -L. On 29 Sep 2005 14:22:15 -0700, wrote: >> *I'M* going to make a donation to the rescue organization that found and >> boarded Gypsy. But it would be really hard for my daughter to do so since [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >-L. I hear ya, I hate them welfare pukes. ..> *I'M* going to make a donation to the rescue organization that found and > boarded Gypsy. But it would be really hard for my daughter to do so since > they lost their home (with no insurance on it since it was paid for and [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > anything other than a thank you card (which she has, along with a long > letter of appreciation). ...> Hugs, > CatNipped I'm sure the organization that rescued Gypsy appreciates your donation. I agree that your daughter needs to get her affairs in order and this will take time. Sometime later, when she is back on her feet, she will have a chance to decide what she can do. I'm sure that the card and letter are much more than a whole lot of people will do. Hugs to all of you (including Gypsy and Digger), Annie > > You know, I dont' at all agree with the fact that they left the dogs. > > However, I also think that to continue to be agressive about this is [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > -L. Lyn, you really should get that prescription refilled, if its been on hold because of financial reasons let me know cripes I'll renew it for you, anything to shut up your dribble. What the...what have I missed? And do I even want to know? Blessed be, Baha > >> Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he > >> looks healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > Jill Lori's Daughter and Son in Law have been reuinted with both their dogs. I have to agree with Annie on the topic of the kicking and the kicked. People whose entire house and everything in it is unsalvageable deserve a small break, at least. And there are many people even worse off than they are among the former residents of NOLA. I'd hope to rescue both my animals and any human members of my family from an impending disaster. But if I could only save one or the other, I can't see leaving a human being behind. What could I possibly say to that person if and when I was reunited with them on the far side of the disaster? And that's MY stance. Melissa >Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he looks >healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, unscathed by his >adventure. She said she saw empty, torn-open bags of dog food laying around >the neighborhood, so it looks like the people who rescued Gypsy also left >food for the animals they couldn't capture (God bless the hearts of those >kind souls!!!). That's so wonderful. Katrina was bad enough without needing 25,000 body bags. There must have been lots of little miracles. > Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he looks > healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, unscathed by [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Thank you so much for all the purrs you sent for my daughter to find her > dogs - purr power is an amazing thing!!!!!! Yeah - the power of purr. So, was Digger excited to see her????? Susan M Otis and Chester >> Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he looks >> healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, unscathed by his [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Susan M > Otis and Chester Digger was probably excited to see *anyone*! > Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he > looks healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > CatNipped I'm so happy about Gypsy and Digger being found OK. :-) You mentioned before that your best friend was missing, did you ever find out what happened to them?  SignatureAdrian (Owned by Snoopy and Bagheera) A House is not a home, without a cat. http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk > > Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he > > looks healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > that your best friend was missing, did you ever find out what happened to > them? Yes, she works for Southeast Hospital and she had to go with the patients who were evacuated to Jacksonville, MS. She has to stay on the grounds 24/7 and didn't have the time or the means to contact me sooner. Her daughter made out OK except that she is, like me, sheltering multiple homeless families. Hugs, CatNipped >>> Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he >>> looks healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > CatNipped I'm *very* glad to hear it. :-) SignatureAdrian (Owned by Snoopy and Bagheera) A House is not a home, without a cat. http://community.webshots.com/user/clowderuk YAHOOO!!! Wonderful to hear that everyone's alive and well and the reunion's on the way. After all the devastating news surrounding our recent tragedy, I'm so glad to hear of something good happening! Blessed be, Baha > Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he looks > healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, unscathed by his [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > CatNipped Hooray! Sandy > Erin finally got down into the parish and got Digger. She said he looks > healthy and, aside from two small scratches on his muzzle, unscathed by [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > CatNipped
|
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.