> Just heard that Galveston is allowing people to take their pets with them on
> the bus when they evacuate. It's about time they realized that people
> shouldn't be forced to leave their pets if they want to evacuate themselves.
>
> W
It is indeed! I still can't beleive they were forcing people to leave pets
behind. Well, I guess I *can* believe it, I'm just horrified by the
thought.
Dan
'bout time. I bet half of those people who wouldn't leave NO was because
they were not allowed to bring their pets.
Lily & her mama
Jazz, RB

Signature
Irulan
from the stars we come
to the stars we return
from now until the end of time
> Just heard that Galveston is allowing people to take their pets with them
> on the bus when they evacuate. It's about time they realized that people
> shouldn't be forced to leave their pets if they want to evacuate
> themselves.
>
> W
Jo Firey - 21 Sep 2005 20:25 GMT
> 'bout time. I bet half of those people who wouldn't leave NO was because
> they were not allowed to bring their pets.
> Lily & her mama
> Jazz, RB
Now I may well have missed something cause the news lately makes my stomach
hurt.
But given what has happened since the day Katrina hit. If you were a poor,
reasonably healthy adult. Living in a relatively solid building - or with
access to one. Would NOT evacuating have been such a bad idea? Sounds like
they were no worse off than those that went to the coliseum.
Also before during and after Katrina, there were reporters in the French
Quarter. After, they were on the air saying "Heck, that wasn't so bad!" A
few hours later there were people dancing the in the street behind them.
Wonder how many folks in NO came back after Katrina and before the levees
broke. Because the news made it look like it was an OK thing to do.
Jo
Thank goodness!
Sandy
> Just heard that Galveston is allowing people to take their pets with them
> on the bus when they evacuate. It's about time they realized that people
> shouldn't be forced to leave their pets if they want to evacuate
> themselves.
>
> W