PING UTB: a few questions

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

George Orwell - 13 Sep 2005 01:43 GMT

Just curious, up to you whether you answer:

One of you said that this is about "f.cking with your friends" and revealing
personal information
(PI). Which person who was outed is your friend? There was Cheryl, Mary, and
Lyn who were outed.
I'm guessing Mary or Cheryl but I can't tell from the post content whose side
you're or who the
friend is.

One of you said that all this happened because the levees broke, and if the
levees are fixed, things
will get better. What would it take to fix the levees? What action are you
requesting?

Are you making any attempt to directly target the people most responsible for
outing your friend,
rather than the newsgroup in general? The outings were unacceptable but not
everyone in rpch+b
approved, and rpca was involved only because someone posted a single message
there.

Reply to this Message

Mr. Kwaaazy Caaatz Executive Vice President UTB - 13 Sep 2005 03:45 GMT

George Orwell bent over and whined:

>Just curious, up to you whether you answer:
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>approved, and rpca was involved only because someone posted a single message
>there.

The PI revealing netKKKops made the rules. This is the UTB, not the
typical run of the mill trolls your pussy people mention in every
poast. I am simply a soldier or mechanic in this freedom fighting
organization. I am very f.cking good at what I do, very. Your PI
revealing netKKKops made the decision to take this to RL, then so be
it. No whining...watch your back...know your friends.

Signature

UTB...Protecting the Innocent and Free Speech

Reply to this Message

Brad W. - 13 Sep 2005 04:37 GMT

> Just curious, up to you whether you answer:

No, really? Wow. That's big of you. :)

> One of you said that this is about "f.cking with your friends" and revealing
> personal information (PI). Which person who was outed is your friend? There was Cheryl, Mary, and
> Lyn who were outed. I'm guessing Mary or Cheryl but I can't tell from the post content whose side
> you're or who the friend is.

Does it matter? And if so, why? What would you do with this information, eh
George? lol

> One of you said that all this happened because the levees broke, and if the
> levees are fixed, things will get better. What would it take to fix the levees? What action >
>are you requesting?

This is just so funny. So very funny. It's a bit late for that, isn't it?

> Are you making any attempt to directly target the people most responsible for
> outing your friend, rather than the newsgroup in general?

Now this is the most interesting question of all. What if they are? Do you have
information about who the culprits are? And are you willing to divulge it
(with proof) if UTB is willing to spare the group?

>The outings were unacceptable but not everyone in rpch+b approved, and rpca was involved only

because someone posted a single message there.

Hahahahahahahaha! Funny how this is the first time you have seen fit to
post this information, isn't it? Pathetic cowards. Gig's up. Time to pay
the piper for all your netcopping fun over the years.

It was your arrogance that "broke the levy." Understand that silence in
such matters is taken as compliance and agreement.

You a.sholes have had this coming for a long, long time.

Now deal with it. Pussies.

Reply to this Message

George Orwell - 13 Sep 2005 10:03 GMT

"Brad W." <home@champaign.il> wrote in
news:aHlwYXRpYQ==.5d9c9b754d8bdb82b69ae60aa73f685e@1126582668.nulluser.co
m:

>> Just curious, up to you whether you answer:
>
> No, really? Wow. That's big of you. :)

I'm gracious that way.

> Does it matter? And if so, why? What would you do with this
> information, eh George? lol

I would satisfy a curiosity. That is all. Life is full of curiosities.

>> One of you said that all this happened because the levees broke, and
>> if the levees are fixed, things will get better. What would it take
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> This is just so funny. So very funny. It's a bit late for that, isn't
> it?

Perhaps. Then again perhaps not. Never say never.

> Now this is the most interesting question of all. What if they are? Do
> you have information about who the culprits are? And are you willing
> to divulge it (with proof) if UTB is willing to spare the group?

I would have to know who you perceive the victim to be before I could say
who the culprits are. I might say one person is the victim and you would
say that person was a culprit.

> Hahahahahahahaha! Funny how this is the first time you have seen fit
> to post this information, isn't it? Pathetic cowards. Gig's up. Time
> to pay the piper for all your netcopping fun over the years.

I haven't netcopped. I'm not even a regular here. I was drawn here by the
allure of the trainwreck. That's why I'm curious rather than angry, I
suppose.

> It was your arrogance that "broke the levy." Understand that silence
> in such matters is taken as compliance and agreement.

Oh, dear. Who knew that my tiny little arrogance bore such power?

> You a.sholes have had this coming for a long, long time.

My a.shole hasn't. My a.shole is rather benign, hot sauce notwithstanding.

> Now deal with it. Pussies.

You expected something other than pussies in a pussycat group?

Reply to this Message

Matthew Kgis - 13 Sep 2005 22:53 GMT

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:03:26 +0200 (CEST), wrote:

>"Brad W." <home@champaign.il> wrote in
>news:aHlwYXRpYQ==.5d9c9b754d8bdb82b69ae60aa73f685e@1126582668.nulluser.co
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>allure of the trainwreck. That's why I'm curious rather than angry, I
>suppose.

Being angry wouldn't do you much good.

>> It was your arrogance that "broke the levy." Understand that silence
>> in such matters is taken as compliance and agreement.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>My a.shole hasn't. My a.shole is rather benign, hot sauce notwithstanding.

LOL

>> Now deal with it. Pussies.
>
>You expected something other than pussies in a pussycat group?

Reply to this Message

Matthew Kgis - 13 Sep 2005 22:50 GMT

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:43:14 +0200 (CEST), wrote:

>Just curious, up to you whether you answer:
>
>One of you said that this is about "f.cking with your friends" and revealing
>personal information

>(PI). Which person who was outed is your friend? There was Cheryl, Mary, and
>Lyn who were outed.

It really doesn't matter. Revealing personal info is not accepted.

>I'm guessing Mary or Cheryl but I can't tell from the post content whose side
>you're or who the
>friend is.

We are on the side of all the free people.

>One of you said that all this happened because the levees broke, and if the
>levees are fixed, things
>will get better. What would it take to fix the levees? What action are you
>requesting?

Patience my dear boy.

>Are you making any attempt to directly target the people most responsible for
>outing your friend,
>rather than the newsgroup in general? The outings were unacceptable but not
>everyone in rpch+b
>approved, and rpca was involved only because someone posted a single message
>there.

Oh well. At least you are attempting to remedy the situation. For that
I give you cudos.

Reply to this Message

Cwaazie Caatttz - 13 Sep 2005 23:01 GMT

Matthew Kgis bent over and whined:

>On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:43:14 +0200 (CEST), wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>Oh well. At least you are attempting to remedy the situation. For that
>I give you cudos.

He just admitted he's against free speech and you're kissing his a.s?

Aren't you special ;)

Reply to this Message

Lamey - The cable guy - 14 Sep 2005 16:02 GMT

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:01:50 -0700, wrote:

>Matthew Kgis bent over and whined:
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
>Aren't you special ;)

You go Boi!

Reply to this Message