Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Thursday 4.5 Quake in NoCal

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jeanne Hedge - 03 Jun 2004 15:57 GMT
Just reading on CNN.com there was a 4.5 quake in northern California
overnight. It was reported to have been centered on the small town of
King's Beach, California (in Placer County), which is apparently about
15 miles SW of Reno, Nevada.

Anyone here in that area? Is all ok?

Jeanne Hedge, as directed by Natasha

http://www.jhedge.com
O J - 03 Jun 2004 18:26 GMT
>Just reading on CNN.com there was a 4.5 quake in northern California
>overnight. It was reported to have been centered on the small town of
>King's Beach, California (in Placer County), which is apparently about
>15 miles SW of Reno, Nevada.
>
>Anyone here in that area? Is all ok?

    It usually takes a transplanted person's family about three years
to stop calling every time they hear of an earthquake.  For a 4.5,
most folks living on top of that fault would experience no damage.

    Thanks for being concerned.

Regards and Purrs,
O J
Help keep California green and golden.  Bring money!
Jeanne Hedge - 03 Jun 2004 20:23 GMT
>>Just reading on CNN.com there was a 4.5 quake in northern California
>>overnight. It was reported to have been centered on the small town of
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>     Thanks for being concerned.

Maybe it's because my mother's side of family lived in LA County (and
some cousins are still there). Every time there was even a slight
tremor she'd call back to Lakewood to see if everyone was ok, or
Grandma would call Indiana to tell everyone that they were all ok ^_^

Sidenote - Grandma and Grandpa in SoCal didn't have any sort of
earthquake insurance on their home, but Mom and Dad in southern
Indiana do. I guess if the New Madrid fault in Missouri's boot heel
goes off extensively, major damage is supposed to happen that far away
(and they have a particularly persuasive insurance salesman...)

Jeanne Hedge, as directed by Natasha

http://www.jhedge.com
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 04 Jun 2004 02:06 GMT
> It usually takes a transplanted person's family about three years
> to stop calling every time they hear of an earthquake.  For a 4.5,
> most folks living on top of that fault would experience no damage.

Hmm... I haven't heard from my family today! :) That's odd. They
wouldn't know Placer County (where Lake Tahoe is) from Alameda County,
where I live. The epicenter is about 300 miles away from here. Usually
if they hear "earthquake" and "California" in the same sentence on the
news, I get at least an email from my mom. Maybe, after my having lived
here 12 years, they're finally getting less worried about it?

I didn't feel a thing with this one - what time was it?

Joyce
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 04 Jun 2004 04:08 GMT
>  > It usually takes a transplanted person's family about three years
>  > to stop calling every time they hear of an earthquake.  For a 4.5,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> news, I get at least an email from my mom. Maybe, after my having lived
> here 12 years, they're finally getting less worried about it?

When I was in Vienna over Christmas, there was apparently a moderate
sized quake somewhere in the middle of the state.  My German is not very
good, and the television news that was talking about it was showing some
horrendous footage (from some prior quake).  I confess I was a bit
panicked until I explained to the concierge at my hotel that I lived in
California, and was worried because I couldn't understand what they were
saying about an earthquake here.  He listened to the news, and told me
what the situation actually was.  (WHEW!)

> I didn't feel a thing with this one - what time was it?
>
> Joyce
Duke of URL - 03 Jun 2004 19:32 GMT
> Just reading on CNN.com there was a 4.5 quake in northern California
> overnight. It was reported to have been centered on the small town of
> King's Beach, California (in Placer County), which is apparently about
> 15 miles SW of Reno, Nevada.

Can ANYONE splain to me WHY anyone continues to live there, knowing the
whole coast is unstable and overdue for gimungous earthquakes that will make
Salt Lake City a seaport? "Oh, I've lived on Mt St Helens all my life and it
hasn't blown up yet."
Signature

The One-and-only Holy MosesT

Gracecat - 03 Jun 2004 21:12 GMT
> > Just reading on CNN.com there was a 4.5 quake in northern California
> > overnight. It was reported to have been centered on the small town of
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> --
> The One-and-only Holy MosesT

Someone's been watching too much Day After Tomorrow ;)

Same reason people live in New Orleans, Kansas, Hawaii... fish the Berring
Sea and oil the north pole.

Grace
Yowie - 04 Jun 2004 01:41 GMT
> > > Just reading on CNN.com there was a 4.5 quake in northern California
> > > overnight. It was reported to have been centered on the small town of
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Same reason people live in New Orleans, Kansas, Hawaii... fish the Berring
> Sea and oil the north pole.

Or anywhere in Australia. Ignoring the deady critters, the weather can kill
you quite easily (there's a well known poem extolling the virtues of
"droughts and flooding rain") and failing that, most of us Aussies live
close enough to the coast so that when the next tsunami hits, we'll all
drown (we're *way* overdue, apparantly).

Why do I live here? Because its home... I can't imagine living in tornado
country, but I'm sure tornado country people can't fathom why on earth I'd
live in a place with such deadly fauna and not even *think* about it (Oh,
hey, there's a redback (deadlier relative of the Black Widow) on my porch.
Isn't she pretty. Better move her to the fence in case someone steps on her)

Yowie
Annie Wxill - 03 Jun 2004 22:05 GMT
...> Can ANYONE splain to me WHY anyone continues to live there, knowing the
> whole coast is unstable and overdue for gimungous earthquakes that will make
> Salt Lake City a seaport? "Oh, I've lived on Mt St Helens all my life and it
> hasn't blown up yet."
If you know of any place on Earth that is immune to any kind of disaster
from earthquake, weather, fire, flood, landslide, or any other natural
event, or where nobody's house just decides to burn down, please tell us
where it is.
Annie, who lives in place that's overdue for a hurricane
Gracecat - 03 Jun 2004 22:21 GMT
Not for long Annie, this year is supposed to bring those overdue ones home
:(

Grace

> ...> Can ANYONE splain to me WHY anyone continues to live there, knowing the
> > whole coast is unstable and overdue for gimungous earthquakes that will
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> where it is.
> Annie, who lives in place that's overdue for a hurricane
Annie Wxill - 04 Jun 2004 02:36 GMT
Thanks, Grace.
I needed that.
Annie

> Not for long Annie, this year is supposed to bring those overdue ones home
> :(
Gracecat - 04 Jun 2004 17:38 GMT
Sorry Annie. I was just grumping myself. I'm not looking forward to them
either.

Grace

> Thanks, Grace.
> I needed that.
> Annie
>
> > Not for long Annie, this year is supposed to bring those overdue ones home
> > :(
Annie Wxill - 04 Jun 2004 18:53 GMT
Grump away, Gracie. I was just this morning reminding myself to keep those
life vests handy in case the water gets too high.
Annie

> Sorry Annie. I was just grumping myself. I'm not looking forward to them
> either.
Jeanne Hedge - 03 Jun 2004 22:23 GMT
>...> Can ANYONE splain to me WHY anyone continues to live there, knowing the
>> whole coast is unstable and overdue for gimungous earthquakes that will
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>where it is.
>Annie, who lives in place that's overdue for a hurricane

Are you in New Orleans or Galveston? (or elsewhere)

New Orleans terrifies me because of being on the seacoast in a
hurricane-prone area and having an average elevation of under sea
level. Is it true that the dikes/flood walls are really the only
protection for the city?

Galveston, Texas terrifies me after I read the book "Isaac's Storm"
about the 1900 Galveston hurricane (the deadliest hurricane in US
(all?) history). And then I read that things really haven't changed
all that much as far as city-wide hurricane precautions goe in the
last century.

http://tinyurl.com/3grvu

OTOH, I spent Friday night and all day Sunday in southern Indiana,
while local tv stations pre-empted all programming to go to
all-weather all the time during a rather large tornado outbreak
(people killed, towns demolished, lots of flooding, etc), and it
didn't really bother me all that much. It was really wild watching one
of those "tower cams" in Louisville, Kentucky trying to focus on a
tornado hidden within a wall of rain across the Ohio River in Indiana.

Jeanne Hedge, as directed by Natasha

http://www.jhedge.com
Gracecat - 04 Jun 2004 02:23 GMT
Is it true that the dikes/flood walls are really the only
> protection for the city?

It's more or less true Jeanne.  Someday we're going to lose the city. I
honestly believe that. But it's not going to be for quite a long time.

Hurricane's seem to have skipped NOLA the last couple times. Andrew passed a
bit to the west, as did Lily. If New Orleans was ever directly hard hit with
a Cat 4/5.  Well.. Miami lived over Andrew, I don't think New Orleans would
survive as well.

Grace
Annie Wxill - 04 Jun 2004 02:47 GMT
> Are you in New Orleans or Galveston? (or elsewhere)
> ...>
> Jeanne Hedge, as directed by Natasha

Hi, Jeanne,
No, we're on the Gulf Coast, but neither of those places. I don't know about
the dikes in New Orleans or the hurricane precautions in Galveston.
So far, in the 10 years we've lived here, we've evacuated once, but the
hurricane changed course and went south of us.  From what I hear, the
hurricanes cause tornadoes, which are just as scary.
My point was that no matter where you live, there's something that can get
you, so you might as well live where you like to be.
Annie
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 04 Jun 2004 04:01 GMT
> ...> Can ANYONE splain to me WHY anyone continues to live there, knowing the
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> where it is.
> Annie, who lives in place that's overdue for a hurricane

FWIW, the worst recorded earthquake on the North American continent
happened in Missouri in the early 1800's - not exactly an area known for
frequent earthquakes!
Mischief - 03 Jun 2004 22:48 GMT
> Can ANYONE splain to me WHY anyone continues to live there, knowing the
> whole coast is unstable and overdue for gimungous earthquakes that will make
> Salt Lake City a seaport?

Um....cause we can?

Why live in Florida with all the hurricanes?  Or why live in the
midwest with all the tornados?

I was born and raised in Northern CA, and I remember the 1989 quake.
That one was pretty freaky, but we still continued to live there.  Now
I live in Southern CA, which is actually worse.  :)  California's my
home, what else can I say?

Kristi
Karen Chuplis - 04 Jun 2004 03:47 GMT
>> Just reading on CNN.com there was a 4.5 quake in northern California
>> overnight. It was reported to have been centered on the small town of
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Salt Lake City a seaport? "Oh, I've lived on Mt St Helens all my life and it
> hasn't blown up yet."

Heh. Probably the same reason we live in tornado country. That's where we
are :)
Duke of URL - 04 Jun 2004 15:34 GMT
> >> Just reading on CNN.com there was a 4.5 quake in northern California
> >> overnight. It was reported to have been centered on the small town of
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Heh. Probably the same reason we live in tornado country. That's where we
> are :)

Well, I can get in my storm cellar if necessary - it's awfully hard to hide
from quakes...
Now, whichever one of you California witches did it to me, QUIT! One dream
of being in a quake was enough - you've had your revenge for my doubting
your intelligence.
Signature

The One-and-only Holy MosesT

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 04 Jun 2004 03:59 GMT
>>Just reading on CNN.com there was a 4.5 quake in northern California
>>overnight. It was reported to have been centered on the small town of
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Salt Lake City a seaport? "Oh, I've lived on Mt St Helens all my life and it
> hasn't blown up yet."

Frankly, I prefer it to spending most of the summer in the basement,
waiting out "tornado" watches - always with the possibility of having my
home demolished above me!  (You never know when a quake will hit, so you
get on with your life until it does - you don't put everything on hold
every time you listen to the weather reports.)  Severe quakes don't
happen that often, and despite the science-fiction writers, California
is NOT very likely to plunge into the Pacific as a result of one!  (Not
in our lifetimes, or those of our grandchildren, certainly.)
Sherry - 04 Jun 2004 15:44 GMT
>Frankly, I prefer it to spending most of the summer in the basement,
>waiting out "tornado" watches - always with the possibility of having my
>home demolished above me!

Oh, it's not that bad, really. Weatherman equipment is so sophisticated now,
they exact location is pinpointed these days.  The worst part of it is watching
the local weather people interrupting regular programming, and acting like a
bunch of rabid squirrels while you're missing your favorite TV shows. I really
want to throw my shoe at the TV, especially lately, when for some reason
"Tornado" has become a verb, and even evolved into "Tornado-ing."
"This storm is likely to tornado within the hour."
"The wall cloud is tornado-ing at this very moment. Take your tornado
precautions."
It just makes me cringe.
Sherry
Bridget - 05 Jun 2004 00:46 GMT
>>Frankly, I prefer it to spending most of the summer in the basement,
>>waiting out "tornado" watches - always with the possibility of having my
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> It just makes me cringe.
> Sherry

I don't know about the tornado'ing' bit, but I have to admit I was one
of 100,000 people in my community the other night glued to the
television as we literally watched the path of a tornado (those of us
who weren't literally in the path) and the rest of the storm cells pass
by us.  The local channel just preempted whatever was on and showed
nothing but local storm weather and doppler radar stuff.  It was very
way cool.  We could see the streets we lived on and the streets where
the tornado was going. We could see the storm cells on the television
and tell when they were going to hit us and how long they were going to
last.  I was talking to a friend of mine who doesn't have a television
and telling her exactly what was fixing to happen to her weather wise.

Mind you, this isn't something they do everyday.  This is the first time
they have ever done it.  Basically, once we were under a literal tornado
watch and not just a warning.  So other than that we just get the
regular obnoxious updates like every other channel does.  But this was
really one of the coolest things I have ever seen.  It made me
understand why thunderstorm warnings and tornado warnings are the length
they are as I watch all that stuff go on and move out of the warning
area at the time the warnings expired.  And, this is not something they
could have done if the community was larger than it is.  It is just the
perfect size to be able to do something like that and not have everyone
calling and screaming about programming.  And best of all...it was
commercial free. :)

Bridget
Jo Firey - 03 Jun 2004 21:19 GMT
Normally a 4.5 will only make the chandelier swing and cause a little wave
action in the swimming pool. (not that I have either)  You will only feel it
if you are awake and paying attention.  Richter scale numbers are pretty
misleading.  There is a tremendous difference even between a 4.5 and a 5.0

Jo
> Just reading on CNN.com there was a 4.5 quake in northern California
> overnight. It was reported to have been centered on the small town of
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> http://www.jhedge.com
Seanette Blaylock - 04 Jun 2004 01:56 GMT
"Jo Firey" <JAfirey@NETZERO.NET> had some very interesting things to
say about Re: Thursday 4.5 Quake in NoCal:

>Normally a 4.5 will only make the chandelier swing and cause a little wave
>action in the swimming pool. (not that I have either)  You will only feel it
>if you are awake and paying attention.  Richter scale numbers are pretty
>misleading.  There is a tremendous difference even between a 4.5 and a 5.0

I managed to notice a 4.4 occurring 20-something miles away. DH, OTOH,
did not. We were both awake and sitting at our computers when I
thought I felt something, looked at the beverage on my desk, and it
was sloshing a little.

Signature

"Don't mess with major appliances unless you know what you are doing
(or unless your life insurance policy is up-to-date)." - John, RCFL

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) - 04 Jun 2004 03:50 GMT
> Just reading on CNN.com there was a 4.5 quake in northern California
> overnight. It was reported to have been centered on the small town of
> King's Beach, California (in Placer County), which is apparently about
> 15 miles SW of Reno, Nevada.
>
> Anyone here in that area? Is all ok?

They must have been hard up for "news" - 4.5 is usually scarcely noticeable!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.