Cat Forum / Cat Anecdotes / May 2004
since we were on the subject...
|
|
Thread rating:  |
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 05 May 2004 04:02 GMT OK, I can't resist posting this joke, which I just received today. It fits in with a recent discussion. Some of you won't like it, and some, I'm sure, will love it. YMMV!
Joyce
---------------------------------------- A woman bought a very expensive fancy car, full of bells and whistles. Just before she drove it off the lot, the sales guy showed her how to use the radio.
"It's easy," he explained. "You just tell it what you want to listen to, and it finds you a station automatically." To demonstrate, he said "blues" to the radio, and it quickly started playing Robert Johnson.
Impressed, the woman drove the car off the lot and tried different styles. "Classical," she said, and heard Bach. "Folk" - and Joan Baez filled the car. "Rock," and the radio started playing U2.
Just then a car came careening through an intersection and nearly hit her. "*ssh*le!" she yelled out the window...
"Good morning!" the radio chirped, "Welcome to the Rush Limbaugh show!"
Kreisleriana - 05 May 2004 05:27 GMT >OK, I can't resist posting this joke, which I just received today. >It fits in with a recent discussion. Some of you won't like it, and [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] >"Good morning!" the radio chirped, "Welcome to the Rush Limbaugh >show!" BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Forwarded in all directions. ;)
Theresa alt.tv.frasier FAQ: http://www.im-listening.net/FAQ/
Single-mindedness is all very well in cows or baboons; in an animal claiming to belong to the same species as Shakespeare it is simply disgraceful. (Aldous Huxley)
Seanette Blaylock - 05 May 2004 10:01 GMT jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net had some very interesting things to say about since we were on the subject...:
I'd sub "Howard Stern" here, especially since Rush Limbaugh gets at least partial credit for my meeting and marrying Bob.
Or was this just more "let's slam the conservatives, since that's OK, but heaven help them if they return it, I'll lead a group flameout"???
>OK, I can't resist posting this joke, which I just received today. >It fits in with a recent discussion. Some of you won't like it, and [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] >"Good morning!" the radio chirped, "Welcome to the Rush Limbaugh >show!"
 Signature "Don't mess with major appliances unless you know what you are doing (or unless your life insurance policy is up-to-date)." - John, RCFL
jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 05 May 2004 10:40 GMT > I'd sub "Howard Stern" here, especially since Rush Limbaugh gets at > least partial credit for my meeting and marrying Bob. I'll agree with putting Howard Stern in that joke, too. :) Can we throw in Dan Savage as well? And Dr. Laura? Also, that wacko, Ann Coulter.
> Or was this just more "let's slam the conservatives, since that's OK, > but heaven help them if they return it, I'll lead a group flameout"??? I've never started a flamewar on this newsgroup!
I do reserve the right to slam conservative politicians and public personalities, though.
Joyce
Victor Martinez - 05 May 2004 13:50 GMT > I'll agree with putting Howard Stern in that joke, too. :) Can we > throw in Dan Savage as well? And Dr. Laura? Also, that wacko, Ann Coulter. Hey, what's wrong with Dan Savage? He's hilarious! Have you read his book Slouching towards Gomorrah? You must read it!
> I do reserve the right to slam conservative politicians and public > personalities, though. Me too. Particularly those who incite hatred towards me.
 Signature Victor Martinez Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM) Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com
David Yehudah - 05 May 2004 18:03 GMT Victor, your post had me puzzled for a moment. First time through I read that book title as "Slouching Toward Gonorrhea," then rather belatedly realized that couldn't be right, could it? :-)
>> I'll agree with putting Howard Stern in that joke, too. :) Can we >> throw in Dan Savage as well? And Dr. Laura? Also, that wacko, Ann [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Me too. Particularly those who incite hatred towards me.
 Signature ÐÏࡱá
Sherry - 05 May 2004 18:15 GMT >Victor, your post had me puzzled for a moment. First time through I read >that book title as "Slouching Toward Gonorrhea," then rather belatedly >realized that couldn't be right, could it? :-) Good Lord. That sounds like it could be the title of those horrid "health films" they used to make us watch in high school.
Sherry
Hopitus2 - 05 May 2004 20:50 GMT Heh, no Sherry, that film was "Reefer Madness", remember? But Hopitus is finally, admittedly, *confused* - as I zip through the tv channel changer's itinerary, sometimes I see that Howard Stern dude and stop in my tracks: he always has some near-naked bimbo doing very naughty things onscreen w/ or w/o assistants or other "guests" while Stern eggs her on w/lewd comments. What has what I've observed to do w/politics? I never see anyone saying anything about party affiliations or the election! Or have I just missed Stern's political connections because I snort briefly and resume channel-surfing? He's been kicked off our local radio, I read, but I can't see where it's for anything but a general media (tv) "put-on" (fake) indignation and censoring of risque stuff due to that bimbo who flashed her boob nationwide. Tv bigwigs don't really want to clean things up, they are just following up w/what they *think* the public wants. Now *that's* "knee-jerk".....but I still can't connect it to politics.
: >Victor, your post had me puzzled for a moment. First time through I read : >that book title as "Slouching Toward Gonorrhea," then rather belatedly [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] : : Sherry jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net - 05 May 2004 21:07 GMT > I see that Howard Stern dude and stop in my tracks: he always has > some near-naked bimbo doing very naughty things onscreen w/ or w/o > assistants or other "guests" while Stern eggs her on w/lewd comments. > > What has what I've observed to do w/politics? Oh, nothing. But the joke had the woman yelling "*ssh*le" in her car, causing the fancy radio to play <fill in your most hated announcer here>. The original joke said Rush, Seanette wanted to change it to Stern, which I couldn't argue with. I'm not even sure what his political affiliations are, I just think he's a jerk.
BTW, Victor, re: Dan Savage - let me get back to you. I might have him confused with someone else...
Joyce
Sherry - 05 May 2004 23:37 GMT >Heh, no Sherry, that film was "Reefer Madness", remember? But Hopitus is >finally, admittedly, *confused* - as I zip through the tv channel changer's [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >w/what they *think* the public wants. Now *that's* "knee-jerk".....but I >still can't connect it to politics. My ever-so-humble and uninformed opinion is that Howard Stern rode the shock radio wave, period. I never really paid any attention NOR do I even remember any of his political affiliations. I'm no fan of Rush Limbaugh either. Big deal. I"m learning to roll with the flow though, and it takes a whole lot to offend me these days. Does that come naturally with age? There was a post here referring to Baptists once, and I thought about getting offended for about half a second, then I snorted and said, "Oh, hell, she's right."
Sherry
Cheryl - 06 May 2004 01:40 GMT > My ever-so-humble and uninformed opinion is that Howard Stern rode the > shock radio wave, period. He used to be a jock here in DC before he was syndicated and he was a riot. I never paid attention to his political affiliations, either, but he sure had 'em. I have an MP3 from his radio show the morning of 9/11/2001 and some of the things he was saying was dead-on before it ever came out in mainstream news. Oh, and I remember him playing "a.s Man" (character with his a.s cheeks cut out of leather pants). What a not-so-attractive a.s to have hanging out, too. bleh.
 Signature Cheryl
Victor Martinez - 06 May 2004 03:29 GMT > of risque stuff due to that bimbo who flashed her boob nationwide. Tv > bigwigs don't really want to clean things up, they are just following up > w/what they *think* the public wants. Now *that's* "knee-jerk".....but I > still can't connect it to politics. In this case it actually is politics. These people (Ashcroft, Powell (Colin's son), etc.) want to shove their morals down our throats. That's just not right. If you fing a TV or radio program offensive, don't watch it. That's what I do. I'm happy. The people who like these shows are happy. Everybody wins!
 Signature Victor Martinez Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM) Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com
Seanette Blaylock - 06 May 2004 10:29 GMT jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net had some very interesting things to say about Re: since we were on the subject...:
>I do reserve the right to slam conservative politicians and public >personalities, though. But if I do the same to your beloved liberals, I'll get gang-flamed into non-existence, now won't I?
 Signature "Don't mess with major appliances unless you know what you are doing (or unless your life insurance policy is up-to-date)." - John, RCFL
LOL - 06 May 2004 18:48 GMT > jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt@sonic.net had some very interesting things to say > about Re: since we were on the subject...: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > But if I do the same to your beloved liberals, I'll get gang-flamed > into non-existence, now won't I? On the contrary, Seanette; the liberals are the ones who acknowledge the right of free speech. You're entitled to your opinion. Post it.
------ Krista Who's sorry, but she couldn't sit on her hands any longer
Tanada - 06 May 2004 20:17 GMT > On the contrary, Seanette; the liberals are the ones who acknowledge > the right of free speech. You're entitled to your opinion. Post it. > > ------ > Krista > Who's sorry, but she couldn't sit on her hands any longer Krista, you really opened a potential can of worms here. You are implying that conservatives do not allow free speech. Is that your intent?
As a screwed up conservative, I could take offense at this remark, but I won't because I don't believe that political discussions really change much. Those who are set in their ways aren't going to budge, and those who get swayed by one side can be as easily swayed by eloquence by the other.
Basically, lets agree to disagree politically and get down to the real debate: Which is better, a calm gentle cat, or a rowdy bad cat?
I have both and they each have their points. The rowdy ones make life interesting and make great story fodder, but I'd rather have Merlin, Huey, and QC share my bed any time rather than Pine Cone, Squeakers, and Honor. The three "bad" cats tend to have control issues, bed demands, and restless leg movements and weird mouth noises in their sleep.
Pam S.
Yoj - 06 May 2004 23:09 GMT > > On the contrary, Seanette; the liberals are the ones who acknowledge > > the right of free speech. You're entitled to your opinion. Post it. [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Pam S. A good, well-reasoned post, Pam! I've shared my home with both types of cats too. I'm still getting mileage out of "Arky stories", even though he's long gone to the RB, but it is much nicer to share a bed with Skeeter and Lindy.
-- Joy Owned and operated by Lindy and Skeeter
Victor Martinez - 06 May 2004 23:56 GMT > Krista, you really opened a potential can of worms here. You are > implying that conservatives do not allow free speech. Is that your intent? In a stereotypical context, "liberals" *love* the 1st ammendment but distrust the 2nd, while "conservatives" do the opposite. :) However, you must admit that traditionally, the more conservative members of the courts are the ones that limit free speech. Take for example the always divisive issue of flag burning. For a "liberal" it's protected speech, while for a "conservative" it's an insult to the country. Guess which members of Congress push for a constitutional ammendment to prevent flag burning?
> Basically, lets agree to disagree politically and get down to the real > debate: Which is better, a calm gentle cat, or a rowdy bad cat? What's a calm gentle cat? Never heard of those... ;-)
 Signature Victor Martinez Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM) Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com
Tish S - 07 May 2004 02:46 GMT Funny, in Australia the Liberal Party *are* the conservatives!
Australia's two major political parties are the Liberals and Labour, with a swag of minor parties like the Greens, the Democrats (which are *nothing like* the American Democrats), One Nation, etc.
In Australia, at least, the two major parties are virtually indistinguishable in the way they run the country, despite both having quite different founding philosophies. As far as I can tell, the same might be said for the USA - regardless of who is in government, the main issues of poverty, medical care, education and employment are unchanged and who's to say whether the situation in Iraq would have been any different had the other guy been president. [donning flame-proof suit]
All this talk about American political fevor kind-of amuses me, but since I don't understand the details of your constitution and have very little idea which amendment is which, this discussion is largely meaningless to me.
Re: the cats. We have a calm cat (Ted), but she is not gentle - quite the opposite. We also have two rowdy cats (Spock and Persephone) and, unless you're a bed mouse, they are both gentle. We love them all, but S & P are *much* more fun to play with than Ted (who simply sinks her claws in and stops the game before it has a chance to begin!).
Tish
> > Krista, you really opened a potential can of worms here. You are > > implying that conservatives do not allow free speech. Is that your intent? [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > What's a calm gentle cat? Never heard of those... ;-) LOL - 07 May 2004 04:30 GMT (snippage here and there)
> Krista, you really opened a potential can of worms here. I know, I know - I'm sorry; I had just been reading over and over about how a conservative *isn't allowed* to post an opinion, when of course they're allowed. My computer's been acting up so I was catching up on several days' posts, and this theme was repeated too often for me to be able to ignore it.
Which is better, a calm gentle cat, or a rowdy bad cat?
> Pam S. My rowdy bad cat Mike has been replaced by a calm, gentle lapcat who has me worried sick. I want my little monster back. Bad cats rule.
------ Krista Who is, believe it or not, heavily censoring herself
|
|
|