
Signature
Bob.
Why isn't there mouse-flavored cat food?
Happy New Year, Bob, and all:
>Ok, first off, the heating required for the manufacture and canning of
>cat food will destroy any BSE there is likely to be in any beef used.
I'm not sure that works, since the disease is based on a mutation (a
"prion," I think they call it) rather than a living organism. Also
there are concerns about human safety with some sausage meats, as
these can occasionally contain small fragments of the neural tissue
where BSE is found; this is due to the manufacturing process. And
nobody is saying, 'if you cook the sausage really well, there won't be
a problem.' The concern remains there, and so I assume it remains
with canned foods as well.
>Second, the risk is TINY. In the period 1990-1998 there were only 86
>cases of FSE (the feline form of BSE) recorded in the UK - less than
>10 per year, or to put it another way 0.00015% of the cat population.
Granted that these 86 cases occurred before they'd outlawed adding
carcasses to domestic animal food, which I assume has been done in the
UK, too. However, even if it were only 1 case, it would be hugely
important, if it were my kitty.
>In no case was a direct link made to infected food - in fact at the
>BSE enquiry in 1999 the evidence pointed to Organo Phosphates rather
>than meat as the source of the problem.
I go with the majority opinion here, as expressed in the FDA document
quoted originally.
>Finally, there is no way a normal owner can hope to approach the
>all-round suitability of commercial tinned cat food by preparing a
>home diet. If you stick to tinned food you can't go wrong.
Sure you can. Nothing is absolutely safe. But I agree with you that
it's difficult to provide everything that canned cat food can provide.
I'll truly worry about it when the FDA recalls canned cat foods.
However, in the meantime it's not a bad idea for me to look into other
alternatives. That "Urban Cat" recipe came from a library book in a
town 1100 miles away, so there's no way I can check it now. Will look
around, though and see what else is available in terms of home-made
cat food recipes. Does anyone here have any experience with that?
Barb
Bob Brenchley. - 01 Jan 2004 21:08 GMT
>Happy New Year, Bob, and all:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>I'm not sure that works, since the disease is based on a mutation (a
>"prion," I think they call it) rather than a living organism.
True, but the chemical changes caused to the protein by the necessary
heating for canning does seem to reduce infection to such a low level
that it can be almost ignored.
Having said that, there does seem to be some genetic factor involved
in the matter. Mice fed a diet of infected meat have shown that there
can be a genetic predisposition to cross infection.
> Also
>there are concerns about human safety with some sausage meats, as
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>a problem.' The concern remains there, and so I assume it remains
>with canned foods as well.
Not really. The risk from eating any beef is far lower than from
eating mutton - and yet there has been no world-wide ban on mutton
sales. Add to this the far higher temperatures involved in canning cat
food as against frying a sausage and the risks become very low.
>>Second, the risk is TINY. In the period 1990-1998 there were only 86
>>cases of FSE (the feline form of BSE) recorded in the UK - less than
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>UK, too. However, even if it were only 1 case, it would be hugely
>important, if it were my kitty.
I'm nor sure what you mean by "carcasses" in this context. In the UK,
for at least the last 10 years, there has been a ban on using cow
brains and spinal cords in animal feed. It really should never have
been used, but we followed an American practice believing that the
animal protein would grow cattle faster than just vegetable protein.
>>In no case was a direct link made to infected food - in fact at the
>>BSE enquiry in 1999 the evidence pointed to Organo Phosphates rather
>>than meat as the source of the problem.
>
>I go with the majority opinion here, as expressed in the FDA document
>quoted originally.
I also go with the majority opinion - that there was no direct link
made in any of the 86 cases to the food they ate.
>>Finally, there is no way a normal owner can hope to approach the
>>all-round suitability of commercial tinned cat food by preparing a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>it's difficult to provide everything that canned cat food can provide.
>I'll truly worry about it when the FDA recalls canned cat foods.
Which I honestly don't think will happen - though they may recall a
few of the cheaper dry brands as they are the ones most likely to use
low quality meat.
>However, in the meantime it's not a bad idea for me to look into other
>alternatives. That "Urban Cat" recipe came from a library book in a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Barb

Signature
Bob.
The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
distinction is yours to draw...