> It's not
> practical to test such raw material for any and all possible contaminants.
Au contraire.
We make it practical by exacting a heavy price for not doing it.
That's called civil liability. We do it all the time. We also vote
with our dollars. That's called bankruptcy for the losing company.
We do it all the time.
> Their reputation has been damaged and they have to recall
> and dispose of the contaminated food.
Just watch out they don't feed it to the chickens you are eating.
That will be next. It will go somewhere. It represents somebody's
money. It's not going to go to a landfill until force or the threat
of force is brought to bear. This is the world we live in.
> I think that the food companies are not at fault, this is the growers'
> responsibility. They produced and sold the bad material.
Maybe. How do you get at them?
You've heard the phrase "deep pockets"? That ain't the growers.
Jack