It was the only kitten.
And you can say what you like, but I was advised by a vet that there are
positive health benefits for the mother for having a litter. So I will
continue to do so. Unfortunately, my vet it out of town, and I can't afford
the rates for the emergency alternative.
<"
<
> Another possibility is the mother has picked up an abnormality or
> deformity in the kitten not noticeable to humans. Are the other kittens
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>> How long can a kitten go without it's mom before being considered
>> abandoned?
Vlache - 08 Aug 2006 11:54 GMT
A litter of one - how unusual.
I do stand by my comments on unnecessary feline breeding. I live in an
area where there are already too many cats and every weekend in the paper
there are always kittens to be given away. This has led to strays turning
feral and preying on unique Australian wildlife who have no defence against
a naturally stealthy predator
> It was the only kitten.
>
> And you can say what you like, but I was advised by a vet that there are
> positive health benefits for the mother for having a litter. So I will
> continue to do so. Unfortunately, my vet it out of town, and I can't
> afford the rates for the emergency alternative.
Jimi-Carlo Bukowski-Wills - 11 Aug 2006 13:02 GMT
What's all this topposting crap?
And what's all this crap about it being healthier for the cat to litter???
That's bollox! You're lying or your vet is mad! The op is far less
hazadous than having a litter, and there's no significant difference
between cats that have littered and cats that haven't.
You just wanted to cuddle a bunch of kittens you selfish a.s!
> It was the only kitten.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>>> How long can a kitten go without it's mom before being considered
>>> abandoned?
Vlache - 11 Aug 2006 14:36 GMT
Is there a specific rule or convention about where to place the new stuff
that is being written in a posting?
> What's all this topposting crap?
Matthew - 11 Aug 2006 14:44 GMT
> Is there a specific rule or convention about where to place the new stuff
> that is being written in a posting?
Not really new etiquette went out the doors years ago but some consider
top posting rude. To me it make little difference
Vlache - 12 Aug 2006 07:15 GMT
Okay - so would top posting to be considered rude? Isn't it better to read
the new stuff first.
>> Is there a specific rule or convention about where to place the new stuff
>> that is being written in a posting?
>
> Not really new etiquette went out the doors years ago but some consider
> top posting rude. To me it make little difference
Matthew - 12 Aug 2006 07:19 GMT
That is what I say but some people live in the past to me it makes no
difference as long as it ain't spam or porn
> Okay - so would top posting to be considered rude? Isn't it better to
> read the new stuff first.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> Not really new etiquette went out the doors years ago but some
>> consider top posting rude. To me it make little difference
wester@laway.net - 12 Aug 2006 17:11 GMT
>Okay - so would top posting to be considered rude? Isn't it better to read
>the new stuff first.
I must agree. I get so tired of scrolling through stuff I've read and
read and read just to find that some idjit has either left no content
or added a "Me, too!" at the bottom. Bottom posting surely wastes
bandwidth, but there are those who insist it's the only way. I must
disagree.
>>> Is there a specific rule or convention about where to place the new stuff
>>> that is being written in a posting?
>>
>> Not really new etiquette went out the doors years ago but some consider
>> top posting rude. To me it make little difference
send reply - 17 Nov 2006 02:31 GMT
Well it could be worse. You could be me. Some techno dork has a vandetta
against me and deletes everything I post here. Watch. In a few days this
will be gone. So it doesn't matter where I post. You just have to read it
while it's here.
> >Okay - so would top posting to be considered rude? Isn't it better to read
> >the new stuff first.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> >> Not really new etiquette went out the doors years ago but some consider
> >> top posting rude. To me it make little difference